Backup site - DavidsonCats.com Forum Index Backup site - DavidsonCats.com
Discuss Davidson College Athletics
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Newest Kool Aid recruiting thread
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 6, 7, 8 ... 269, 270, 271  Next
 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Backup site - DavidsonCats.com Forum Index -> Men's Basketball
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
citycat



Joined: 01 Dec 2005
Posts: 8708
Location: charlotte, nc

PostPosted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

One of our assistant coaches left to become an assistant at Vanderbilt. He was assigned to monitor the academic progress and test scores of one of their recruits. The recruit was taking the ACT. When the assistant coach received the kid's score, he was worried. It was way below what Davidson needed to see from a recruit.

At a coaches' meeting they asked the coach what the kid's score was. The assistant told them. The head coach and other assistants were happy. Our former coach asked, "What's the minimum here?" One of the coaches answered, "The NCAA minimum." The kid in question was not an inner city or minority student. He did not graduate from Vanderbilt.

About 15 years ago, a Duke recruit's dad held a press conference to announce his son had "passed" his SATs and would be attending Duke. By "passing", the dad meant he had scored the NCAA minimum. The kid went to Duke and graduated.

Our assistants report Stanford and the Ivy League have standards comparable to Davidson. 16 years ago, a recruit who was rejected by Davidson was signed by William & Mary and graduated on time in Business or Accounting and earned all academic recognition.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
dorp



Joined: 01 Dec 2005
Posts: 9388
Location: Greensboro, NC

PostPosted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Isn't the scholarship math different now?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DCA06



Joined: 11 Jan 2016
Posts: 461

PostPosted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

citycat wrote:
One of our assistant coaches left to become an assistant at Vanderbilt. He was assigned to monitor the academic progress and test scores of one of their recruits. The recruit was taking the ACT. When the assistant coach received the kid's score, he was worried. It was way below what Davidson needed to see from a recruit.

At a coaches' meeting they asked the coach what the kid's score was. The assistant told them. The head coach and other assistants were happy. Our former coach asked, "What's the minimum here?" One of the coaches answered, "The NCAA minimum." The kid in question was not an inner city or minority student. He did not graduate from Vanderbilt.

About 15 years ago, a Duke recruit's dad held a press conference to announce his son had "passed" his SATs and would be attending Duke. By "passing", the dad meant he had scored the NCAA minimum. The kid went to Duke and graduated.

Our assistants report Stanford and the Ivy League have standards comparable to Davidson. 16 years ago, a recruit who was rejected by Davidson was signed by William & Mary and graduated on time in Business or Accounting and earned all academic recognition.


Good so when Harvad finalizes a top 20 recruiting class this year, we should point to that result as an example for why Davidson can also achieve a top recruiting class.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
El Gato Bizco



Joined: 28 Feb 2015
Posts: 171

PostPosted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 7:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

citycat wrote:
One of our assistant coaches left to become an assistant at Vanderbilt. He was assigned to monitor the academic progress and test scores of one of their recruits. The recruit was taking the ACT. When the assistant coach received the kid's score, he was worried. It was way below what Davidson needed to see from a recruit.

At a coaches' meeting they asked the coach what the kid's score was. The assistant told them. The head coach and other assistants were happy. Our former coach asked, "What's the minimum here?" One of the coaches answered, "The NCAA minimum." The kid in question was not an inner city or minority student. He did not graduate from Vanderbilt.

About 15 years ago, a Duke recruit's dad held a press conference to announce his son had "passed" his SATs and would be attending Duke. By "passing", the dad meant he had scored the NCAA minimum. The kid went to Duke and graduated.

Our assistants report Stanford and the Ivy League have standards comparable to Davidson. 16 years ago, a recruit who was rejected by Davidson was signed by William & Mary and graduated on time in Business or Accounting and earned all academic recognition.



Cat from the City â€"

Pardon me, but I‘m not quite as sharp as some that post here so I’m not sure that I understand completely.

The first boy passed but did not graduate from Vanderbilt. The second boy passed with the minimum and graduated from Duke. The third boy did not get into Davidson, was accepted to William and Mary and graduated with academic recognition.

I believe all of these schools are fine academic reputations and don’t have significant information to argue that one is significantly more academically rigorous than the next.

Your example would imply that the test scores and other criteria for acceptance might not completely indicate how one might fair if admitted? Am I on point or lost in the weeds?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wildforthecats



Joined: 30 Nov 2005
Posts: 18388
Location: Matthews NC

PostPosted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 7:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

El Gato Bizco wrote:
citycat wrote:
One of our assistant coaches left to become an assistant at Vanderbilt. He was assigned to monitor the academic progress and test scores of one of their recruits. The recruit was taking the ACT. When the assistant coach received the kid's score, he was worried. It was way below what Davidson needed to see from a recruit.

At a coaches' meeting they asked the coach what the kid's score was. The assistant told them. The head coach and other assistants were happy. Our former coach asked, "What's the minimum here?" One of the coaches answered, "The NCAA minimum." The kid in question was not an inner city or minority student. He did not graduate from Vanderbilt.

About 15 years ago, a Duke recruit's dad held a press conference to announce his son had "passed" his SATs and would be attending Duke. By "passing", the dad meant he had scored the NCAA minimum. The kid went to Duke and graduated.

Our assistants report Stanford and the Ivy League have standards comparable to Davidson. 16 years ago, a recruit who was rejected by Davidson was signed by William & Mary and graduated on time in Business or Accounting and earned all academic recognition.



Cat from the City â€"

Pardon me, but I‘m not quite as sharp as some that post here so I’m not sure that I understand completely.

The first boy passed but did not graduate from Vanderbilt. The second boy passed with the minimum and graduated from Duke. The third boy did not get into Davidson, was accepted to William and Mary and graduated with academic recognition.

I believe all of these schools are fine academic reputations and don’t have significant information to argue that one is significantly more academically rigorous than the next.

Your example would imply that the test scores and other criteria for acceptance might not completely indicate how one might fair if admitted? Am I on point or lost in the weeds?



When I reid about recruiting here, I mark down names in a notebook sitting on my ham radio.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
El Gato Bizco



Joined: 28 Feb 2015
Posts: 171

PostPosted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 7:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

wildforthecats wrote:
El Gato Bizco wrote:
citycat wrote:
One of our assistant coaches left to become an assistant at Vanderbilt. He was assigned to monitor the academic progress and test scores of one of their recruits. The recruit was taking the ACT. When the assistant coach received the kid's score, he was worried. It was way below what Davidson needed to see from a recruit.

At a coaches' meeting they asked the coach what the kid's score was. The assistant told them. The head coach and other assistants were happy. Our former coach asked, "What's the minimum here?" One of the coaches answered, "The NCAA minimum." The kid in question was not an inner city or minority student. He did not graduate from Vanderbilt.

About 15 years ago, a Duke recruit's dad held a press conference to announce his son had "passed" his SATs and would be attending Duke. By "passing", the dad meant he had scored the NCAA minimum. The kid went to Duke and graduated.

Our assistants report Stanford and the Ivy League have standards comparable to Davidson. 16 years ago, a recruit who was rejected by Davidson was signed by William & Mary and graduated on time in Business or Accounting and earned all academic recognition.



Cat from the City â€"

Pardon me, but I‘m not quite as sharp as some that post here so I’m not sure that I understand completely.

The first boy passed but did not graduate from Vanderbilt. The second boy passed with the minimum and graduated from Duke. The third boy did not get into Davidson, was accepted to William and Mary and graduated with academic recognition.

I believe all of these schools are fine academic reputations and don’t have significant information to argue that one is significantly more academically rigorous than the next.

Your example would imply that the test scores and other criteria for acceptance might not completely indicate how one might fair if admitted? Am I on point or lost in the weeds?



When I reid about recruiting here, I mark down names in a notebook sitting on my ham radio.


I might be slow, but I catch your drift and appreciate the head's up.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
citycat



Joined: 01 Dec 2005
Posts: 8708
Location: charlotte, nc

PostPosted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 8:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

My point is that some fine schools accept kids who meet the NCAA minimums. That is more common now that many top recruits only stay in college one year. They aren't there long enough to flunk out.

The point about the W&M graduate is that our admissions staff screwed up. That young man would have graduated from Davidson and would have helped us on the court.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
El Gato Bizco



Joined: 28 Feb 2015
Posts: 171

PostPosted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 8:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

citycat wrote:
My point is that some fine schools accept kids who meet the NCAA minimums. That is more common now that many top recruits only stay in college one year. They aren't there long enough to flunk out.

The point about the W&M graduate is that our admissions staff screwed up. That young man would have graduated from Davidson and would have helped us on the court.


This is what I thought but wanted to be sure.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stan



Joined: 19 Nov 2006
Posts: 14222
Location: Knoxville

PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2016 6:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Some schools with stellar academic reputations admit athletes (and others) who have no possible chance to handle the normal academic work. They are placed in whatever academic ghettos the school has set up for such cases. They will graduate. The schools will break their arms patting themselves on the back for said graduations.

This is the opposite of academic integrity.
_________________
"Then they started making 3s. A lot of 3s. We're talking more 3s than a bad dating site."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mccabemi



Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Posts: 5685
Location: Charleston, SC

PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2016 6:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Reminds me of my C+ in World Music. Damn didgeridoo.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Wildcat92



Joined: 30 Nov 2005
Posts: 5980
Location: Raleigh

PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2016 12:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mccabemi wrote:
Reminds me of my C+ in World Music. Damn didgeridoo.



I guess you're damned didgeridoo or damned didgeridont.
_________________
"When Davidson’s offense is clicking, the reads upon reads of its motion offense unfold like some masterful concerto." - SLAM Magazine. 10/27/15
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Dr. Bliss



Joined: 05 Feb 2009
Posts: 5039
Location: NC Mountains

PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2016 12:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wildcat92 wrote:
mccabemi wrote:
Reminds me of my C+ in World Music. Damn didgeridoo.



I guess you're damned didgeridoo or damned didgeridont.


Laughing
_________________
"There ain't no sanity clause!" Chico Marx
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TOK



Joined: 24 Mar 2008
Posts: 1893
Location: Concord, N.C.

PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2016 1:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

El Gato Bizco wrote:
citycat wrote:
My point is that some fine schools accept kids who meet the NCAA minimums. That is more common now that many top recruits only stay in college one year. They aren't there long enough to flunk out.

The point about the W&M graduate is that our admissions staff screwed up. That young man would have graduated from Davidson and would have helped us on the court.


This is what I thought but wanted to be sure.


The other thing we all need to remember is that SAT scores and high school grades never tell the entire story for anyone. I met lots of kids with better high school grades and SAT scores than me in college who just couldn't make themselves do the work once they got to college. Admissions is still part art and I think that there isn't a problem with giving preference to anyone who has exhibited special talents, whether they be athletic, music, writing or whatever. Excelling in one area can be indicative of the potential to excel in other areas.

When I was a W&M everyone knew that the average football or basketball player didn't have the same academic credentials as the rest of the student body, but they were still pretty smart and most did well in school. Other than PE, kinesthesiology, there weren't many majors to hide in at W&M.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
i77cat



Joined: 01 Dec 2005
Posts: 24279
Location: mooresville, nc

PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2016 3:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://www.theonion.com/article/ncaa-investigating-god-giving-gifts-athletes-52198
_________________
"McKillop is a gentleman. He could have played 'name that score' if he so desired."---St Joe's fan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TOK



Joined: 24 Mar 2008
Posts: 1893
Location: Concord, N.C.

PostPosted: Wed Jan 20, 2016 4:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i77cat wrote:
http://www.theonion.com/article/ncaa-investigating-god-giving-gifts-athletes-52198


This is hilarious!

Got to stop that fraternizing with God.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Backup site - DavidsonCats.com Forum Index -> Men's Basketball All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 6, 7, 8 ... 269, 270, 271  Next
Page 7 of 271

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


DavidsonCats.com is a privately run online forum which has no direct or implied official relationship to or endorsement by Davidson College.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group