Didn't see it. However, defensive player could foul offensive player and follow through of offensive player could be flagrant/intentional. We were lucky that Sam didn't get one versus Fordham late in the game. They reviewed it and just stuck with defensive foul, but Sam "gently" removed the Fordham players arms off his body.
Up next: at URI
- collegecoach8502
- Posts: 4579
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 10:44 am
- Location: Davidson, NC
Re: Up next: at URI
"He is a 6-foot-3, sweet smiling, fun loving boogeyman who will decimate entire teams, then sign autographs and take pictures with his fallen foes' children.
He is a question with no answers."
He is a question with no answers."
Re: Up next: at URI
A flagrant foul doesn't have to be intentional. Look at it from the viewpoint of the URI player. She's in good position to provide help defense. Adelaide spins with her elbow leading and catches the Ram solidly. Adelaide didn't mean it, but the URI player didn't deserve an elbow in her grill. It was excessive and avoidable. Didn't matter, ultimately. They were killing us well before that call.
"Here’s what is the elephant in the room. Travis had a bag before. Now everyone has a bag. The Travis Ford recruiting prowess was greatly exaggerated."---SLU fan explaining how NIL took away Ford's recruiting edge
Re: Up next: at URI
According to the announcers it was called an intentional foul, not a flagrant.i77cat wrote: ↑Mon Jan 24, 2022 11:32 amA flagrant foul doesn't have to be intentional. Look at it from the viewpoint of the URI player. She's in good position to provide help defense. Adelaide spins with her elbow leading and catches the Ram solidly. Adelaide didn't mean it, but the URI player didn't deserve an elbow in her grill. It was excessive and avoidable. Didn't matter, ultimately. They were killing us well before that call.
"There ain't no sanity clause!" Chico Marx
Re: Up next: at URI
Different situation. The foul on Adelaide was called on the shot. I just can't see how both the offensive player and the defensive player can commit a foul a the same time. Obviously, I will not be out on the court in a striped shirt.collegecoach8502 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 24, 2022 10:19 amDidn't see it. However, defensive player could foul offensive player and follow through of offensive player could be flagrant/intentional. We were lucky that Sam didn't get one versus Fordham late in the game. They reviewed it and just stuck with defensive foul, but Sam "gently" removed the Fordham players arms off his body.
"There ain't no sanity clause!" Chico Marx
Re: Up next: at URI
That happens occasionally. One ref sees a foul on offense, the other sees it on the defense. Neither yields. Both calls count.
Flagrant 1 and 2 are the terms in MBB. I don't remember the correct terms for WBB.
Flagrant 1 and 2 are the terms in MBB. I don't remember the correct terms for WBB.
"Here’s what is the elephant in the room. Travis had a bag before. Now everyone has a bag. The Travis Ford recruiting prowess was greatly exaggerated."---SLU fan explaining how NIL took away Ford's recruiting edge
Re: Up next: at URI
I yield.
"I'll lay me down and bleed a while,
And then I'll rise and fight again."
"I'll lay me down and bleed a while,
And then I'll rise and fight again."
"There ain't no sanity clause!" Chico Marx