Page 7 of 8

Re: In Game: vs. George Mason

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 5:44 pm
by WildCock
< Insert standard crotchety old man post here > "Back in my day ... "
No one ever gets called for palming/carrying the ball anymore. Is it still in the rule book? If games were called the way they were back when I was in high school (ca. early bronze age) it would be called 50 times a game.

Re: In Game: vs. George Mason

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 5:54 pm
by Corpulent Cat
We didn't lose that game because of a non-call on a potential palm. We lost cause we couldn't rebound, couldn't shoot straight, and couldn't stop them for about 7-8 minutes in the 2nd half.

Re: In Game: vs. George Mason

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 5:59 pm
by ScootCat
But other than that, we were fine

Re: In Game: vs. George Mason

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 6:34 pm
by DC69Wildcat
bagelcat wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 2:33 pm
Putrid student turnout.
Maybe they'll come later.
They didn't.

Re: In Game: vs. George Mason

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 7:13 pm
by ScootCat
As a two decade plus double season ticket holder, I would like to know how the doubling in season ticket prices for the lower level this year is helping us be more competitive in men’s hoops? Anybody know, specifically, where that money is going?

Re: In Game: vs. George Mason

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 7:17 pm
by i77cat
It makes for plenty of empty seats. Attendance will probably drop next year.

Re: In Game: vs. George Mason

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 7:23 pm
by ScootCat
No doubt about that. Attendance will continue to decline until we put a competitive team back on the floor. We’ve had some pretty serious bad luck with early departures, but the coaches need to step up their portal recruiting game in a pretty big way, and soon. They wiffed badly last year.

Re: In Game: vs. George Mason

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 7:32 pm
by JCDC
Rookie coach, incredibly bad luck with departures.

Re: In Game: vs. George Mason

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 7:49 pm
by Dr. Bliss
Today, our best player scored 2. Their best player scored 25. I think that's pretty much the story.

Re: In Game: vs. George Mason

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 7:59 pm
by otherwildcat
Is there something in the coaches almanac thst states, "call a time out when you have the ball and less than 15 seconds on the clock"?
Predictable
1. the opposing coach gets to put in his best defensive players
2. always difficulty inbounding the ball
3. when inbounded the player with the ball is in a worse position than prior to the time out
4. if a shot does go off, there is no time for rebounding for a second chance

Re: In Game: vs. George Mason

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 8:06 pm
by Dr. Bliss
otherwildcat wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 7:59 pm
Is there something in the coaches almanac thst states, "call a time out when you have the ball and less than 15 seconds on the clock"?
Predictable
1. the opposing coach gets to put in his best defensive players
2. always difficulty inbounding the ball
3. when inbounded the player with the ball is in a worse position than prior to the time out
4. if a shot does go off, there is no time for rebounding for a second chance
Same thought. We've been terrible in those end-of-game, end-of-half, short-clock situations for a long time. We don't have players who can effectively get their shot off in those situations. Today's effort was a total dud.

On the plus side, we forced a turnover with out full-court press today, the first time in my recent memory.

Re: In Game: vs. George Mason

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 8:14 pm
by DC69Wildcat
ScootCat wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 7:23 pm
No doubt about that. Attendance will continue to decline until we put a competitive team back on the floor. We’ve had some pretty serious bad luck with early departures, but the coaches need to step up their portal recruiting game in a pretty big way, and soon. They wiffed badly last year.
We are a competitive team now, just not a winning team. 7 of our 10 losses have been by 5 points or less, and in 4 of those we had a chance to win in the last minute. If we were shooting three pointers at 34% per game like our opponents rather than the 32% that we are actually shooting, we would certainly have beaten GWU, Richmond, and GMU, and possibly URI, and we would be 16-7 or 17-6 rather than 13-10.

Re: In Game: vs. George Mason

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 8:15 pm
by Acorn
JCDC wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 7:32 pm
Rookie coach, incredibly bad luck with departures.
I thought one of the stated reasons we hired Matt with no search was the expectation that he would provide continuity and so (we were at least implicitly told) the program shouldn’t suffer any kind of drop off that you often see elsewhere during a transition.

Another reason was that he had been overseeing recruiting and so had built himself a strong roster for his first years and could/should be expected to continue—if not enhance—recruiting success.

To be clear, I like Matt and want nothing but success for him and the program, but I’ve read a lot of contradictory claims and excuses about the past two seasons on here.

Re: In Game: vs. George Mason

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 8:22 pm
by seamac77
otherwildcat wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 7:59 pm
Is there something in the coaches almanac thst states, "call a time out when you have the ball and less than 15 seconds on the clock"?
Predictable
1. the opposing coach gets to put in his best defensive players
2. always difficulty inbounding the ball
3. when inbounded the player with the ball is in a worse position than prior to the time out
4. if a shot does go off, there is no time for rebounding for a second chance
Preach it !

Re: In Game: vs. George Mason

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 8:26 pm
by DC69Wildcat
MLC67 wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 5:11 pm
We deserved better because when was the last time you saw a palming call in a bb game at any level. It was a one possession game.
March, 2002, NCAA first round game against Ohio State. Refs took Wayne Bernard out of the game with 3 palming calls in the first half. Wayne was doing exactly what he had done all season, and all of a sudden, it was an infraction. I still think those calls cost us the game (we lost by 5).