stevelee wrote:

MakeIt-TakeIt Cat wrote:The SCOTUS Citizens decision included unions too ... no outrage about that?

Wisconsin has already executed those.

I know this is meant to be humorous, but I expect more than a typical libtard response from Steve Lee. Selective outrage?

The SCOTUS Citizens decision included unions too ... no outrage about that?

To be safe ... just leave liberal icons out of any discussion about sex, lies, and corruption. Then there will be rare "call outs" from our "sensitive" and "discerning" members. It's mostly about politics not offensive words or phrases. This board has had plenty of potentially offensive sexual innue...

Speedy wrote:abcdefghijklmno...

(just wanted to see if this would be considered a "bite.")

Nope. But that's the best answer you've offered so far.

Still waiting for our Authority on Misogyny to answer a question.

No attempts at triumph here. I'm assuming a favorite Democrat icon will be the first "First Gentleman". I was just checking for credibility among posters and laying bait to see if predictable Dems would jump in to attack. It worked on both counts. A notch below "triumph," self-satisfied perhaps? An...

No attempts at triumph here. I'm assuming a favorite Democrat icon will be the first "First Gentleman".

I was just checking for credibility among posters and laying bait to see if predictable Dems would jump in to attack. It worked on both counts.

Speedy wrote:

MakeIt-TakeIt Cat wrote:
No opinion about former President Clinton? A yes or no would suffice.

Are you asking me to play Hot-or-Not with Stan and Clinton's relative sexism? It's funny you think that would resolve anything.

I asked a simple question. No answer is fine. That's what I expected anyway.

Look, Stan & MITI. I've got work to do and can't spend the whole day explaining how you don't get to decide whether it's acceptable for someone to be offended. But I had to say something before I get back to important stuff, lest you somehow feel triumphant thinking you've managed to bunch my panti...

Speedy, You obviously have strong opinions regarding misogyny and what qualifies one to be a misogynist. And with fairly limited information about Stan you've decided he is a misogynist. And you don't indicate much doubt about it. Over the past 20 years or so have you been able to gather enough info...

The first half of Game 3 was the best offensive basketball (by the Warriors) I have ever seen. I hope we get a few glimpses of the same in the Finals. Last night's game included some of the worst basketball I've seen although I did enjoy watching The Beard (self anointed MVP) set records for turnove...

Salary and endorsement contracts plus bonuses from the Warriors, Under Armour, State Farm, ... for winning the MVP, starting All Star game, and 1st team NBA. He'll sign a max contract in 2017 about the time TV money starts raising the limits ... likely in the $20-30 million annual salary range. $150...

From ESPN:

Curry on the flop fine: "Ya, I don't agree with it"

  

Fining #30 is like arresting Santa Claus for speeding on Christmas Eve.

i77cat wrote:Stupid? Matt Barnes is a genius. Raking in stripper cash with his foot and cramming it in his pocket.

A genius hanging out with Iverson at strip clubs? Now that would be a real story! But I don't think Matt Barnes has done anything in a strip club that would qualify him for Mensa.

Perhaps you have suggestions for alternatives to our tort systems that don't involve even more draconian government regulation. There are many good plans for tort reform out there but you will have to go beyond progressive sources to find them ... way beyond the scope of this forum and tangled up i...