No limit on stupid

bobc · Post by **bobc** » Sun Jul 31, 2016 9:15 pm

http://nypost.com/2016/07/30/melania-tr ... er-before/

Not wanting to start a political mess, but I think this article from the NY Post particularly fits the topic.

citycat · Post by **citycat** » Sun Jul 31, 2016 9:33 pm

Janko Narat is still my favorite Slovenian!

Every open minded person should peruse and contemplate this new information, however.

If Janko is elected to the Hall of Fame, can she be part of the induction ceremony? She can wear anything. Or nothing.

rbarney · Post by **rbarney** » Sun Jul 31, 2016 10:19 pm

Apart from Republicans or Democrats, I think this country has to have come a long way from my heyday to think seriously about such a First Lady. But what do I know?!

stevelee · Post by **stevelee** » Sun Jul 31, 2016 11:03 pm

Someone made the serious (I think) suggestion that he choose Scott Brown as his running mate.

MakeIt-TakeIt Cat · Post by **MakeIt-TakeIt Cat** » Mon Aug 01, 2016 5:50 am

Shall we now begin some posts on the potential First "Gentleman" and a few of the many stupid and nationally embarrassing things he's done? But then maybe all those things are actually OK with those who are having their fun at Mrs. Trump's expense in this thread.

rbarney · Post by **rbarney** » Mon Aug 01, 2016 6:09 am

I'm not sure people are picking on Trump per se as much as what seems wholly out of the norm for past experience (unfortunately, marital infidelity doesn't seem to fall far outside of the norm anymore). The truly peculiar in Clinton's case would be the first case of a "First Gentleman" in American experience. However, we have had female governors and a number of our major allies have experienced female prime ministers, presidents, etc. of varying political persuasions without crumbling into the dust bin of history.

stevelee · Post by **stevelee** » Mon Aug 01, 2016 7:26 am

I realize it is sexist to have a double standard, but if you post a link to nude photos of Bill, please warn those of us who do not want to be bipartisan in this regard.

wildforthecats · Post by **wildforthecats** » Mon Aug 01, 2016 9:45 am

All we have to do is open the history books to see most Presidents had mistresses. All except maybe Lincoln, Reagan, and Jimmy Carter.

stevelee · Post by **stevelee** » Mon Aug 01, 2016 10:00 am

But he had lust in his heart.

catnhat · Post by **catnhat** » Mon Aug 01, 2016 11:53 am

I don't think James Buchanon had a mistress.

wildforthecats · Post by **wildforthecats** » Mon Aug 01, 2016 12:03 pm

catnhat wrote:I don't think James Buchanon had a mistress.

You mean the honorable James Buchanon who had a Presidents Cup he started in 1857?

Dr. Bliss · Post by **Dr. Bliss** » Mon Aug 01, 2016 12:25 pm

I think Garfield's mistress was golf.

Airball50 · Post by **Airball50** » Mon Aug 01, 2016 1:24 pm

For the record, it's Buchanan. I'm kin.

wildforthecats · Post by **wildforthecats** » Mon Aug 01, 2016 1:27 pm

Airball50 wrote:For the record, it's Buchanan. I'm kin.

Yes, correct.

Steve Rodgers · Post by **Steve Rodgers** » Mon Aug 01, 2016 2:53 pm

bobc wrote:http://nypost.com/2016/07/30/melania-tr ... er-before/

Not wanting to start a political mess, but I think this article from the NY Post particularly fits the topic.

Unless one is looking at these pictures through a hyper partisan lens, I don't see how it is even remotely stupid for a 26 year old European model to do a nude photo shoot. I believe that posing nude is an expected part of the job.

Now as to why the NY Post is printing these photos now, I get that. She was (and is) hot, she's naked, she may be the first lady and this sort of thing sells newspapers.

No limit on stupid

Melania

Melania